Hypodermic
Needle Theory
This theory
began with people analysing the government propaganda of the First World War
and was developed during the 1920s and 1930s. The theory supposes that the
audience is passive and that their
thoughts, values and beliefs are easily shaped by the media. Messages from the
media are directly injected into people’s minds hence the name hypodermic
needle theory.
Reception
Theory or Audience Positioning
Birmingham
University academic Stuart Hall helped develop this theory in 1973. He supposed
that media producers encoded texts to contain certain messages but once an
audience decodes those messages the meaning may have changed rather like a game
of Chinese whispers. This theory sees the audience as active and divides them into three categories.
- Dominant: There is little change in the intended message and the way it is viewed.
- Negotiated: The audience may agree with some elements but disagree with others
- Oppositional: The audience is in conflict with the text and disagrees with it.
This theory
could be applied to the film Hunger about Bobby Sands. Looking at reviews online
I can see that some people viewed the film as unbiased and simply about the
human aspect of hunger strikes. Others argued that it portrayed the IRA in too
positive a light and others agreed with the film but felt it didn’t portray the
characters positively enough. These different reactions seem to depend on the political
beliefs and opinions held by the individual before watching the film.
Uses
and Gratifications Theory
Blumler and
Katz developed this theory in 1974. It suggests that the audience is active and uses the media product but
is not in turn used by the media producers. They believed that audience chooses
the mass media it wants due to a variety of reasons. Criticism of this theory includes
the fact that it gives no insight into how we decode messages embedded in the
media and does not account for other influences.
- Information/Education
- Entertainment
- Identification (The audience sees the characters as role models)
- Integration/Social interaction (The audience discusses the media product with others and uses the media product to bond with people.)
- Escapism
- Sexual Stimulation
This theory
could be applied to the film Sex in the City. Some people enjoyed the film for
it’s entertainment value, some identified with the lead characters, some
watched it because it was a talking point between them and their friends, some
enjoyed the fashion and glamour and others liked the sex and nudity.
Two
Step Flow Theory
Lazarsfeld
and Katz developed this theory in 1940. It suggests that the media communicates
messages to an audience of opinion leaders who decipher those messages and in
turn communicate them to others. The
audience is viewed as semi-passive.
An example of these opinion leaders includes critics and reviewers who view a
media product and then rate it and recommend it. Another example is social
media where people often share information and media products with their
network of followers often with their views attached.
Cultivation
or Reinforcement Theory
George
Gerbner developed this theory. He suggested that the media has long term
effects that are small but build up over time. He believed that although the
audience is passive the media can
only reinforce opinions that they already hold. Critics of this theory say that
it does not take into account the audience’s culture or background.
This theory
could be applied to Horror films. There are often reports in newspapers that there
is a connection between violent films and actual violence. In the film Scream the killers are horror movie
fans. One of the characters defends the genre by saying “Movies don’t create
psychos. Movies make psychos more creative.” This suggests that a person has to
already have a propensity for violence to be influenced by onscreen depictions of
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment